News

Dorgan can end hypocrisy

Democratic congressional candidates scour the countryside for votes by proclaiming themselves the champion of the family farmer and little guy. Now they control both houses of Congress. It’s time for them to put up or shut up by addressing the long-festering need for limiting farm subsidies to mega farms in the 2007 farm bill.<br/><br/>

Looking Out for #1

A couple of articles today highlight the use of biotech crops, and the general international resistance to buying, feeding, or consuming them. Genetically modified seeds have proven enormously popular in the United States, but proof of the beneficial effects of such crops to actual farmers -and society as a whole- often seems to be lacking. Usually, it seems the beneficiaries are seed companies, not farmers.

Wilford Brimley Would be Shocked

It is a truism of the sustainable agriculture movement that federal farm programs have distorted the planting decisions made by farmers. In short, you wouldn't see so much of the five big program crops around (corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, rice) if the government didn't support them so generously. Obviously, there are some basic laws of economics involved.

In the Crosshairs Again

Last Sunday, I put up a perhaps dramatically titled piece on farm subsidies, WTO, and other (much larger) sectors of the economy looking at agriculture subsidies as a road block to the successful completion of the Doha round of trade negotiations. Yesterday The Hill published another article on the very same subject:

Pages

Get the Newsletter