Insult to Injury... Mega-Dairy Style

Editors Note: Remember John Crabtree? He was the keeper of the Blog for Rural America back in the dark ages of 2006 when we were over on blogspot. You can still read all of his pre-2007 posts over there. We are glad to have him back here today with a longer version of a Corporate Farming Note that will appear in our forthcoming newsletter. It is also an excellent post.

In Jo Daviess County, Illinois, a particularly disconcerting brand of corporate farming is coming to town.  Perhaps I am biased because I know so many dairy farmers in northeast Iowa, southwest Wisconsin and northwest Illinois, but I find the location of an 11,000 head (or more) mega-dairy so close to the heart of family farm dairy country the epitome of adding insult to injury.

Stop the Mega Dairy But wait a minute, let me back up a little and talk about how we got here.  Everyone thinks of Wisconsin when they think of dairy.  They even call their state “America’s dairyland” and put that slogan right on their license plates.  And, they wear foam cheese wedges on their heads at football games… not all of them, mind you, but enough to make the point.  They are proud of their heritage, as well they should be.

California has a lot of dairy cows too.  According to the California Department of Agriculture, in 2007 there were over 1.8 million dairy cows in 1,960 dairies in California making the Golden State the largest producer of milk in the country.  Wisconsin can only boast about 1.25 million dairy cows… on 14,170 farms.  Just to help with the math, all this comes to 925 cows per dairy in California and 88 cows per farm in Wisconsin.

Now California has never been able to match Wisconsin for dairy reputation.  Not enough Californians that will wear those cheese wedges on their heads, I guess.  But they keep trying.  If you go to the Happy Cows section of the Real California Milk website I highly recommend playing the downloadable Happy Cows Game, talk about your checkoff dollars at work.

Despite these efforts, the California dairy climate has declined somewhat in recent years.  In 1999 there were 2,200 dairies (with 1.5 million cows).  And in 2007 the number of dairies continues to slip from 1,982 to 1,960 dairies.  San Bernardino County alone lost 14 dairies last year.  Of course, San Bernardino County looks as big as Indiana on the map but still, the state is losing some dairies.  And one reason is that some of them are moving to other states.  The movers site development and regulatory pressure as the main reasons for relocating.

And that brings us back to A.J. Bos, the Bakersfield, California dairy magnate with a dairy empire of over 50,000 cows in multiple states, and Jo Davies County Illinois.  Bos is seeking to build two industrial dairy sites with at least 5,500 cows and heifers in Jo Daviess, about a mile from Nora, Illinois (population 200 or thereabouts).  Illinois law would allow him to double the number of cows at each site within two years, with no additional supervision, if the cost of the expansion is less than 50% of the initial cost of construction.  That could bring the Bos operation up to 22,000 cows.

If you are not familiar with the Illinois-Iowa-Wisconsin tri-state area, let me put it this way, residents of Jo Daviess County can stand in a field and throw rocks at Wisconsin residents.  I am not saying they would do such a thing, but they could.  Jo Daviess borders Wisconsin on the north and Iowa on the west (but in order to throw rocks at Iowans they would have to clear the Mississippi River, which would be no small feat).  And like their neighbors to the North and West, this is small farm country with their fair share of dairy farms.

Remember when I mentioned earlier that the average dairy farm in Wisconsin has 88 cows?  Well, this is where this story really goes off the rails for me.  An industrial dairy operation with up to 22,000 head of cows is a monster, no matter where you put it.  But as I said in the opening of this post, putting it so near the heart of America’s family farm dairy country is exceedingly insulting and injurious.

Despite stiff opposition from local residents, and an eleven to five vote earlier this year by the Jo Daviess County Board recommending that the Illinois Department of Agriculture deny the mega-dairy construction permit, Bos was able to convince the department to grant a construction permit for the site.

If you want to read more about this proposed, and some well placed acrimony, check out Peter Hardin in the June 2008 edition of The Milkweed.  As he describes it:

In truth, Nora-area residents probably face this invasion of California dairy resources because their neighborhood is so sparsely populated.  Illinois state rules require a 2420-foot set-back from homes, and a 4840-foot set-back from businesses, for dairies of the size proposed.  In rural Illinois, it’s hard to find enough acreage where lack of population density allows such set-backs.    


It’s one thing to talk about massive relocation of this nation’s food production from arid western deserts back to the Midwest and Plains – where water and grain are supposedly “cheap.”  But, practically speaking, as Nora area residents face the specter of many thousands of dairy animals literally in their back yards, serious questions arise.

Members of Helping Others Maintain Environmental Standards (HOMES), a grassroots organization that sprang up in Nora, Illinois (population 200) and surrounding communities in opposition to the Bos mega-dairies, have filed for an injunction against the construction arguing that the Illinois Department of Agriculture wrongfully granted Bos the construction permit.  The village of Nora is less than one mile from the proposed mega-dairy site.

According to Hardin, Warren Goetsch – Bureau Chief of Environmental Program for the Illinois Department of Agriculture – has ultimate authority over the regulatory approval of Bos’ plans.  And Goetsch, under oath at a January 10, 2008 public hearing held at the Warren high school in Jo Daviess County, could not recall his agency ever having turned down an application for a large-animal facility.  It is an understatement to say that the HOMES folks have a long row to hoe.

Ken Turner, Warren, Illinois resident and mega-dairy opponent said it as well as any, “We have to fight for the right to breathe air and have drinkable water… This is not the ag you grew up with.  This is not the future of ag.”

Mr. Turner is right, of course, but what he and his neighbors are trying to accomplish may very well be the future of democracy in rural America.  And for that they deserve a look and a helping hand.

Think about it this way.  While the residents of Nora, Warren and Waddams Grove struggle to protect the air, water and quality of life in their communities, will Bos’ mega-dairy help drive 100 tri-state family farm dairy operations out of business, or just 50?

You're probably right, it is

You're probably right, it is to late to arrest the death spiral of the high cost, low efficiency commodity dairies in the Midwest. Certainly from an aesthetic standpoint, injecting a giant dairy into the community would just wipe out the remaining value in the other, smaller, enterprises: their area's attraction as a place for second homes or a tourist destination. The small Midwest dairies have been spoiled by overgenerous handouts and price supports that rewarded below average performance and stifled innovation. The only way they can survive is to differentiate themselves by growing organic or other specialty milks.

Wisconsin Dairy

Dear Sir,

With all due respect, the world continues to evolve and become more efficient.  The large corporate dairy farms are much more efficient, cost effective and help keep down the cost of all dairy related food.  While I appreciate your nostalgic point of view, you should feel lucky they decided to put the farm where they did instead of in China.....

 Best,

David W Cook

dairies and efficiency

Dear Mr. Cook, with all due respect, no they are not.  The mythological efficiencies of industrial livestock and milk production are, frankly, lies told to and by government officials and the like to ensure they keep in place policies that favor corporate farming and industrial production systems.

Are there economies of scale in livestock production and dairying?  Sure there are, and those economies of scale are generally realized at 80 to 100 cows and, for good measure, 150 sows (farrow-to-finish).

In fact, to draw in Phillip's comment into this thread, over generous price supports and inequities in the market place (allowed by or even derived from public policy) support the inefficiency of larger, industrial operations even more than they do so for smaller producers.  And if ever a sector in agriculture has stifled innovation it is industrial livestock systems.  Do you really believe that 30 year old confinement system "technologies" are innovative?

If automakers underwent the same "innovation" that industrial livestock systems over the last 40 years we'd all be driving Dodge Darts and AMC Gremlins.

You want real innovation, put an entrepreneurial owner-operator in charge, not some corporate hack.  I'm not nostalgic, but you are if you think industrial livestock systems are the most efficient.  Don't make the mistake of thinking my ideas are quaint.  You don't know me, but if you did, you'd know, like most people that get to know me, I am the furthest thing from quaint and nostalgic.

I've actually grown up and worked on farms with lots of different production systems.  And on one thing we agree, the world continues to evolve.  I'm not opposed to competition, efficiency and innovation.  I embrace them, perhaps you should too.  We'd all be better off if people stopped apologizing for the likes of A.J. Bos and made him compete on a level playing field.

John Crabtree 

Fluid milk, wrapped butter,

Fluid milk, wrapped butter, and blocks of rat-trap cheese are fungible commodities, like rolled steel. If you are not in the lowest 10-20% cost bracket among producers, you will probably not survive, and you certainly will not earn a fair return on the capital invested. You'll get no argument from me about the damage subsidies create, both economically and environmentally. Unfortunately, far too many farm enterprises and rural communities are addicted to these handouts. If an 80 cow dairy in Wisconsin can produce fluid milk and rat trap cheese less expensively than a 20,000 cow dairy in Tulare County, God bless 'em; may the best man win. My point is that they probably can't, and need to find ways to add value and get away from the commodity products. It is in the value added sphere that a savvy individual can run rings around the pencil-protector set.

mega dairy

Do mega dairies bring in more illegal aliens?  "Efficient" illegal aliens, you might say.  In Texas it does.  I'm not in the dairy business, but I'm for the home folks. 

amen to the last two comments

I'm for the home folks too... and I prefer family farmers over the big corporate hacks... I still say, level the playing field and we'll see how it all comes out, but I say amen to the point about reaching high value markets is the better approach for the little guys too (especially high value markets that the corporates cannot steal away after they are established).  John Crabtree

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Answer this question to show you are human and help us prevent spam.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.